An innovative approach to evaluation: Theory-informed, ‘expected versus actual’, evaluation of educational practice used in a public health parenting programme

  • Jane Thomas Senior Lecturer in Public Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton,UK
  • Neha Shah Public Health Speciality Registrar, NHS London, UK
  • Nirandeep Rehill Public Health Speciality Registrar, NHS London, UK
  • Salim Vohra Senior Lecturer in Health Promotion and Public Health University of West London,UK
Keywords: Public health, Parenting, Evaluation, Training, Pedagogy, Theory of change

Abstract

Background: Evaluations of public health and education are interventions aimed at improving wellbeing needed to ensure investment in projects with the highest likelihood of patient or public benefit. Evaluations normally focus on interventions as they are delivered, with recommendations arising from participants’ feedback, outcomes and comparison with other programmes. Nevertheless, some public health tools, such as needs assessments and audits, do use ‘expected versus actual’ (EVA) comparisons.

Methodology: This research sought to evaluate the teaching methods used in a parenting programme. To do this, the teaching activities associated with different educational theories were collated into a checklist and the parenting training was analysed using this list, to identify gaps in practice. Thus, what might be expected to be seen in education delivery was compared with actual delivery.

Result: This is an innovative approach to evaluation that can be tested in other settings. Here the evaluation showed only minor gaps in the pedagogical methods used, due to the programme has run for over a decade. Nevertheless, the providers planned to make changes as a result of the exercise.

Conclusion: The EVA evaluation is a beneficial adjunct to the evaluation of wellbeing-related interventions using the ‘theory of change’ approach.

 

References

Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards. London, UK: Longman.
Anderson, L.W. & Bloom, B. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, USA: Longman.
Barbour, R. (2007) Doing Focus Groups. London, UK: Sage.
Bates, B. (2016). Learning Theories Simplified. London, UK: Sage.
Clarke, S. (2011). Active Learning through Formative Assessment. London, UK: Hodder.
Day, D., Michelson, D., Thomson, S., Penney, C., & Draper, L (2012), Evaluation of a peer led parenting intervention for disruptive behaviour problems in children: community based randomised controlled trial, British Medical Journal, March 12 2012: 1-10;344:e1107 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1107
Donaldson, L. and Donaldson, R. (2003) (2nd edition, revised). Essential Public Health. Newbury, UK: Petroc Press.
Dubroja, K., O’Connor, M., & Mckenzie, V. (2016). Engaging parents in positive education: Results from a pilot program. International Journal of Wellbeing. 6(3), 150-168. doi:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.443
Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance, Scientific American, 207 (4): 93–107.
Gagne, R.M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th edition). New York, USA: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gibbs, G. (2015). Maximising Student Learning Gain. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (Eds), A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: enhancing academic practice (pp.193-208). London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Government of Canada (GoC) (2102). Theory-based Approaches to Evaluation: Concepts and Practices. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/audit-evaluation/centre-excellence-evaluation/theory-based-approaches-evaluation-concepts-practices.html
Gravells, A. (2012). 5th edition Preparing to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector. London, UK: Sage Learning Matters.
Halperin, S. & Heath, O. (2012). Political Research Methods and Practical Skills, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers. London, UK: Routledge.
Knowles, M. (1988). The Adult Learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
Mackenzie, M. & Blamey, A. (2005). The practice and the theory: Lessons from the application of a theories of change approach. Evaluation, 11, 151–168.
Merriam, S. & Bierema, L. (2014). Adult Learning Linking Theory and Practice. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Reece, I. & Walker, S. (2007). 6th edition Teaching, training and Learning a practical guide, Tyne and Wear, UK: Business Education Publishers.
Schunk, D. (2014). 6th edition Learning Theories and Educational Perspective. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Shah,N., Rehill, N., Burrage, L. & Thomas, J. (2018) Ealing Positive Parenting Pilot: Evaluation, Report for Health Education England, North West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Groups.
Spiegelman, D. (2016). Evaluating Public Health Interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 70-73.
Sternberg, R. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2004). Successful Intelligence in the Classroom, Theory Into Practice, 43, 274-280.
Thomas, G. (2007). Education and Theory: strangers in paradigms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
Wells, P. (2007). New Labour and evidence-based policy making: 1997-2007, People, Place & Policy Online: 1, 1: 22-29. Retrieved from https://extra.shu.ac.uk/ppp-online/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/new_labour_evidence_base_1997-2007.pdf
Wright, J. & Cave, J. (2013). Assessing Health Needs. In, Guest, C., Ricciardi, W., Kawachi, I. & Lang, I. Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice (pp.38-47). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Published
2019-09-18
How to Cite
Thomas, J., Shah, N., Rehill, N., & Vohra, S. (2019). An innovative approach to evaluation: Theory-informed, ‘expected versus actual’, evaluation of educational practice used in a public health parenting programme. International Journal of Perceptions in Public Health, 3(3), 74-81. Retrieved from http://ijpph.org/index.php/ijpph/article/view/169
Section
Articles